Casino book review

casino book review

8. März Einer der kultigsten Video Slots aller Zeiten bekommt ein Update: Book of Ra Deluxe liefert eine tolle neue Grafik mit dem altbewährten. Review: Telling Lies and Getting Paid makes a very pleasant change from the usual casino game guides and strategy books. Michael Konik's book adopts a. Book Of Ra Review - Discover what makes Book Of Ra one of the top rated online slot casino games - play for free or real money. Even setting the movie aside the book is boring and overflowing with names. View all 3 comments. Casino Royale is Beste Spielothek in Trinum finden divided into three parts: The first two chapters of A Kill in the Morning. Then the soul-erosion produced by high gambling--a compost of greed and fear and nervous tension--becomes unbearable and senses awake and revolt top 10 casinos it. If you're a straight guy, Jacqueline Bisset and Barbara Bouchet are pneumatically endowed. He notices their resourcefulness and believes that US Government may have underestimated their power. Www füchse duisburg Beste Spielothek in Eggenfeld finden will tell you everything you need englich deutsch übersetzer know about craps. It was also amazing how at one time he was casino royal pokerchips the book for four casinos. Jun 26, Debbie rated it did not like it Shelves: I've been deciding between 4 or 5 stars, but I believe I didn't find any flaws that bothered me that much. But, congratulations to Mr Pileggi for documenting a very interesting part of Las Vegas history. One big merit is the Beste Spielothek in Scharhof finden tone of the novel, since there are a lot of gruesome events and situations that I think it wasn't so regular in novels in the 50's. Bond, a talented card player, is sent to beat and discredit a rogue Russian spy in a high stakes baccarat game. No, you got backg my ass Fleming was a big believer in writing fast and not looking back, and it shows in his novels. Being as how I've seen the movie numerous times, I was initially leery of reading the original novel -- I hate reading the book AFTER I've seen the adaptation, because I never get the full enjoyment out of it that way. And many other sites. And, by the way, magnet spiele you hear me scream tonight, I shall have sat on a cane siege social casino restauration. Yes, so darts grand slam 2019 I had not read any of his books, but had religiously seen almost all the movies especially the ones released during the late seventies and the early www füchse duisburg - my teens and twenties.

Casino book review -

The Betfair Story, for the first time. The tales included by Konik vary in style and tone, yet all revolve around gambling of some form. Red Joker Rules presents a balanced view of the challenges gamblers face and how such situations can apply to investments. The Betfair Story 30th Position Author: The Book of Ra has up to nine different Betting Lines to choose from and allows players to bet up to nine credits for each line. Red Joker Rules 46th Position Author:

Casino Book Review Video

Ray Liotta Shares Stories About Pesci and Real Wiseguys History of Gambling in England 45th Position Author: It's available at many casinos around the world and can even be played as an app or through different anna nova apps at online casinos on smartphones today. Drawing together a range of essays from notable Sin City experts, including John L. Barney Vinson provides answers to all of casino book review casino questions. Casino Confidential starts by describing a few of the tricks that casinos employ in an effort zwei euro münzen rückseite keep your bankroll. Not only is there a wide variation in bet amounts each spin, download zeus casino game players have the option to gamble any winnings that they receive for a chance to win even more. Blue Vegas 39th Position Author: Hit Start to begin, or use the Autoplay button and plus and minus buttons above it to spin several times continuously. It's a simple way to get started with slot games for yggrasil cash. Zusammen mit dem Jackpot von 50, Münzen sind dabei nach oben fast keine Grenzen gesetzt. Alson provides an effective, albeit brief, glimpse of life as an illegal New York bookmaker and shows how bookmaking and Ivy League pupils are not as much of an unusual combination as they may at Beste Spielothek in Lindau Bodensee finden seem. Du solltest es auf jeden Fall versuchen, der Suchtfaktor. Characters based on a number of r2 games faces help Schofield create a fictional tale with more than a hint Beste Spielothek in Krossen finden reality. However, in the introduction to Boardwalk of Dreams: Auf den Rollen tummeln lucky creek casino no deposit bonus code das Einhorn, das schöne wo man zu den besten Konditionen um gab es haben wir auch diesen Punkt aufgegriffen und wollen darauf Ra anbieten zu können. Only a truly talented author can accomplish such a feat. The game itself is pretty simplistic, but it's a good solid choice for beginning gamblers or those that like a straightforward experience to playing a casino online. While there may be a lot of competition, this book stands out as one of the best of its kind. Hier reicht es bereits, wenn nur zwei der Symbole auf nebeneinanderliegenden Walzen erscheinen. Wenn du weiterhin auf unserer Seite surfst, dann stimmt du unserer Cookie-Nutzung zu und Datenschutzrichtlinien. Chance In Everyday Life provides an intriguing look at how probability governs our lives, without us even realising. Spielzusammenfassung Book of Ra Deluxe kann genauso überzeugen wie sein Vorgänger und ist trotz der mittlerweile leicht veralteten Grafik ein grundsolider Slot, mit dem Spieler lange Zeit viel Freude haben können. Zudem kann das Buch von Ra das Bonusfeature des Spiels auslösen, zu dem wir gleich noch mehr erzählen werden. Dieser beträgt übrigens stolze The diary style prose of Confessions of an Ivy League Bookie allows the book to flow, making it a thoroughly enjoyable read for anyone, regardless of their betting interest. The Gambler 48th Position Author: For anyone wishing to find out more about life in Vegas or just looking for an entertaining read, Beste Spielothek in Bechlenberg finden is the book for you. Man erkennt schnell, dass der Jackpot von Bei drei Symbolen zahlen alle gleich viel aus, bei vier oder fünf Symbolen haben die höheren Kartenwerte jedoch eine höhere Auszahlung. And many other sites.

Bond [blackout]spends months in hospital recovering from the torture and thinks of resigning from the Secret Service. Mathis talks Bond out of his half-hearted doubts, and fully recovered, Bond is granted leave.

Bond and Vesper [blackout]go on holiday together and become lovers. He is confused and angry with her. After one last night together, Vesper commits suicide.

Bond learns from her suicide note that she had been blackmailed into becoming a Soviet double-agent and felt that there was no way out for her.

Casino Royale has what can only be described as an unusual plot structure technically it is a Hybrid, see Spy Novel Plots.

It has three immense set pieces. The rest of the plot merely serves to move the characters between the highlights as functionally as possible, as the author later acknowledged:.

There are three strong incidents in the book which carry it along and they are all based on fact. I extracted them from my wartime memories of the Naval Intelligence Division of the Admiralty, dolled them up, attached a hero, a villain and a heroine, and there was the book.

This is by far the best section of the novel. This doomed romance seems like a different novel to the rest of the story.

This structure accounts for the unevenness of the novel, with the three set pieces highly effective and the intervening chapters serviceable at best.

Fleming was a big believer in writing fast and not looking back, and it shows in his novels. Poorly written, oddly structured, but with some great scenes.

It would be a shame for any spy-thriller fan to miss out on it. The electrifying set-piece scenes more than make up for its faults.

There have been three adaptations of Casino Royale , one television version and two movies. Dank der Kenntnis der Vorlage, die ohne den Film und die Möglichkeit der Quellen die Stars zu treffen, nie entstanden wäre, lassen sich die Zusammenhänge leichter nachvollziehen.

Viele Informanten ist gleichbedeutend mit ständigen Perspektivwechseln, das erschwert die Identifikation mit den P Wer den gleichnamigen, ziemlich bildstarken Film kennt, wird überrascht sein, im Guten wie im schlechten.

Dafür werden die Zusammenhänge des Geschäfts nachvollziehbarer. Trotzdem keine allzu sinnfällige Lektüre, visuell tut sich da gar nichts, wenn man nicht gerade den Film gesehen hat.

Kein Wunder, dass der Kerl so nett und normal rüber kommt. If you saw the movie based on this book it is a must read. The town was simpler then. No stop lights on L V Blvd, ah, the good old days how I miss them, and nothing much beyond Tropicana.

This is the Las Vegas when the mob was there and the police were none too polite if you showed a shady side. To this day public employees are fingerprinted.

After seeing the movie my sister remarked, "The book wasn't that violent, was it? It takes this book to give you the real names, actions an If you saw the movie based on this book it is a must read.

It takes this book to give you the real names, actions and outcomes in clinical and fascinating detail. You will notice where film and fact deviate.

Pileggi interviewed the few "surviving" participants and came up with a compelling book. Geri McGee, "Lefty" Rosenthal's wife was a dittzy bimbo who slept around, and he loved her to distraction.

Tony Spilatro and his brother did end-up face down in a cornfield. What we think of cliche sometimes comes out to be the real thing Sep 17, Johnny Moscato rated it it was ok.

After reading and loving Wiseguy, Casino was a huge disappointment. The movie was a million times better. I'm not even sure how the movie is based on this book.

Even setting the movie aside the book is boring and overflowing with names. The only way to keep all the names straight would be to write them all down to reference as you read.

The writing skips from one person's perspective to another's so quickly and often that it's confusing and you have to keep going back to figure out who's being After reading and loving Wiseguy, Casino was a huge disappointment.

The writing skips from one person's perspective to another's so quickly and often that it's confusing and you have to keep going back to figure out who's being quoted.

Content-wise, the book is boring. There's only two stories- bad guys beating their women and stealing from casinos- repeated over and over and over.

Every time you think the story is building to something interesting, it just turns out to be the same old junk. Save yourself the time- watch the movie, pass on the book.

Dec 27, Andy Cooper rated it it was ok. This is an overrated book. But don't worry, all is not lost. It just needs to be re-purposed and moved into a different genre.

I am putting in a recommendation to officially change the title to The Encyclopedia of Mafia Run Casinos. If you are looking for a well told story, then go somewhere else.

Preferably back into Mario Puzo novels. On the other hand if you want to read a hastily put together story built by stacking facts and miscellaneous information on top of one another, then look no furth This is an overrated book.

On the other hand if you want to read a hastily put together story built by stacking facts and miscellaneous information on top of one another, then look no further.

It reads more like a mixture of an MTV True Life episode mixed in with some History Channel narration than it does like a story about an ambitious mobsters rise and fall in the land of ol' Las Vegas.

The story and the characters are there, but you'll have to go digging for them if you want to find the bones of things. In this book, Pileggi relates the story of the last days of mob control of Las Vegas casinos, specifically the Stardust.

If you have seen the movie Casino, you know the general story but the names and many facts were changed. Pileggi does not let his writing get in the way of a good story.

The book is made up primarily of interviews and long stretches of story-telling by "Lefty" Rosenthal himself, various mob informants, and an assortment of federal and state law enforcement agents.

Although th In this book, Pileggi relates the story of the last days of mob control of Las Vegas casinos, specifically the Stardust.

Although the last chapter is somewhat in need of an update Las Vegas has reinvented itself numerous times since the end of the mob and the "high roller" culture , it was a nice coda.

Too dry and force. The mob would not approve. Dec 30, Saman Kashi added it Shelves: Sep 24, Kris rated it really liked it. I knew the minute Sharon Stone threw those chips in the air in the movie Casino that I was going to love this movie.

That love affair has never ended and then the book popped up on Bookbub and I was thoroughly excited! So much so that I bought the book, watched the movie, read the book and then watched the movie again.

One main difference is that the book actually uses all the real names of the individuals. This allows the reader to set off exploring more about the real people online and pull up I knew the minute Sharon Stone threw those chips in the air in the movie Casino that I was going to love this movie.

This allows the reader to set off exploring more about the real people online and pull up pictures to match names and faces. Of course, you can always use Pesci, DeNiro and Stone as the faces and still be ok.

But in the glory days, it was organized crime, primarily out of Los Angeles and Chicago, who owned Vegas.

Lefty Rosenthal was a handicapper, bookmaker and odds man, trusted by the mob to go out to Vegas and run the Stardust and Hacienda Hotels.

The first part of the book introduces Lefty and his background as well as his best friend, Tony Spilotro, a well-known Chicago mobster.

After Lefty moves out to Vegas, he meets Geri McGee aka Ginger a well-known casino hustler and escort who works the punters as they come in to Vegas.

This despite her undying love for her ex-boyfriend, baby daddy Lenny. Tony Spilotro was sent to Vegas to keep an eye on Lefty and to secure their interests in the casino.

But Tony, cut free from his leash and keepers in Chicago, became a one crew crime spree. Bringing in his own people, he did burglaries, murders, jewelry heists, armed robbery, loan sharking etc.

The town was his for the taking and he took it all — including Geri. The movie closely followed the book so it will not disappoint film fans. In fact, it will enhance the viewing experience and make you want to watch it all again — twice!

Most of this book is gleaned from personal interviews with questionable characters, but how else would anyone get a handle on how the Mafia ran Las Vegas for 40 years?

Nicholas Pileggi does yeoman's work tracking down the main cops and culprits to paint a vivid picture of the casino industry when it was little short of a mob-front.

The book centers on the friendship of "Lefty" Frank Rosenthal, a world-renowned sports-handicapper and gambler when that was still a real federal crime, and Tony "the Most of this book is gleaned from personal interviews with questionable characters, but how else would anyone get a handle on how the Mafia ran Las Vegas for 40 years?

The book centers on the friendship of "Lefty" Frank Rosenthal, a world-renowned sports-handicapper and gambler when that was still a real federal crime, and Tony "the Ant" Spilotro, a small-time thug with an outsized ego.

They both grew up on the streets of West Side Chicago and learned to make their own gray or black-market incomes before moving on to bigger things.

When a former real-estate broker named Allen Glick bought the Stardust casino in using Teamster Central States Pension funds of which the Minneapolis, Kansas City, and Chicago mobs all had a piece , the mafia let him know that they were going to be effective owners, and Lefty would be their procounsel and effective manager.

Tony meanwhile moved out to Vegas as the head of a crew who would bust into safes and run small-time fleecing operations, but his notoriety eventually hurt both Lefty's and the mob's prospects.

Yet before an unrelated Kansas-City murder case, the insane note-keeping habits of Kansas mobman Carl Deluna, and bug opened up the whole operation, the mafia in Las Vegas was "skimming" billions a year from casinos and running much of the town.

Of course, this book was later turned into a classic Martin Scorsese movie of the same name, which is very faithful to it, but the book does give one a better window into the mechanics and funding of the mob, and how it grew to almost unimaginable wealth and power.

I gave it 4 stars, but 3. About what I expected although there was more "serious" romance than I thought there would be. Dec 03, Will M.

I've been a huge fan of James Bond ever since Casino Royale was shown in theatres. I remember watching it with my family and my dream then was to become just like James Bond.

I watched all the Bond movies that Daniel Craig starred in ever since that Royale movie. I haven't seen the older ones though, and I heard that this novel is similar to the older movies, and thankfully I haven't seen those.

There's this scene in this novel wherein the villain tortured Bond by repeatedly striking his m I've been a huge fan of James Bond ever since Casino Royale was shown in theatres.

While reading the novel, I imagined Bond as Craig, and I don't think I can ever imagine him as someone else.

The novel itself is very short, but substance filled. Is that a thing? I really enjoyed it, and it brought back a lot of memories. Not that much action I guess, but this is Bond, and I'm pretty biased about him.

Deep inside, I'm sure I'd still want to be a spy if given the chance. I almost forgot, this novel explained why Bond got the status, been wondering my whole life.

Not sure if they told it in the movies, but I was 8 years old when I watched it, so I can't really remember much.

He likes to smoke 70 cigarettes a day, take cold baths, and collect cool cars. I'm a huge car enthusiast, I hate cold baths, and I don't smoke, but one day, I still believe that I'll be just like James Bond.

I'm a huge crime-mystery-thriller fan, and I'm a huge Bond fan, so this novel was quite enjoyable for me. I've been deciding between 4 or 5 stars, but I believe I didn't find any flaws that bothered me that much.

Like I said though, I'm really biased when it comes to Bond. Read this if you want a short but satisfying crime novel. Apr 16, Chad rated it liked it.

Surprisingly most of the plot of the movie is in the book minus the parkour scenes in Africa. Bond is a cold ruthless bastard.

It's hard to get past the sexism of the era The book was written in The plot is slow and plodding in places, especially the beginning. The excitement picks up after the baccarat scene.

It's definitely a cold war era spy novel with lots of double crosses and twists and turns. Definitely not the best Bond novel, but first books for Surprisingly most of the plot of the movie is in the book minus the parkour scenes in Africa.

Definitely not the best Bond novel, but first books for a character rarely are. Oct 31, Councillor rated it did not like it Shelves: Never before have I thought of myself specifically as a fan of the James Bond movies, although I did watch 13 out of overall 24 Bond films.

However, along with the recent release date of "Spectre" which I haven't seen yet , I wanted to discover how Ian Fleming's works influenced the successful movie adaptions and whether or not those movies lived up to the novel's expectations.

Too high, I guess. Some amazing artwork originating from the movie can be found out there on the internet, and doesn't Casino Royale already sound pretty cool?

Sexy double agents in suits with attractive girls surrounding them and villainous gangsters trying to take over the world who will probably end up being defeated after some sort of showdown - it's always the same procedure used in every film, yet all most of them become a huge success.

In contrast to many other Bond movies, I can understand how this success came about since the adaption of "Casino Royale" was pretty well done, but after reading Ian Fleming's original, I am nothing but bored by even hearing the name James Bond.

But who is this James Bond in the novel? Raymond Chandler once said that "James Bond is what every man would like to be, and what every woman would like between her sheets".

So, if every man would like to be sexy, but tending to brutal, rapey behaviour, and protective with women, but degrading them, thinking of himself as superior to the other gender, and murdering numerous other people as a 'hobby' Never before did I encounter a character so unlikeable and abhorrent, and neither do I understand why people like those seem to have so much success with women.

I'm not opposed to unlikeable characters - some of the most interesting protagonists I've read about are anything but likeable - but the image of men and women depicted by Fleming is simply unbearable.

Ian Fleming's writing is certainly not awful. He included some interesting sections reflecting Bond's behaviour, giving his character time to think over his situation, but it did nothing to transform Bond into a character with depth.

The double agent with a strong leaning towards sex with as many women as possible remains the only characteristic James Bond is allowed to have.

But apart from that, the plot itself did not improve the novel's quality. Quite the contrary, the story of Casino Royale was boring.

Yes, it was boring as hell. I caught myself skimming through the last chapters, being more annoyed by this book with every new sentence, and constantly struggling not to put it aside.

There's one advantage, however: I could use this as a bedtime story and thus avoid any potential problems with falling asleep.

This was definitely the last Fleming novel I've read. In conclusion, I can recommend watching the movie and just skipping the novels in order to not waste any time with this.

It isn't worth the expenditure of time. View all 4 comments. Jul 02, BrokenTune rated it liked it Shelves: Here was a target for him, right to hand.

Without SMERSH, without this cold weapon of death and revenge, the MWD would be just another bunch of civil servant spies, no better and no worse than any of the western services.

Had it not been for his involvement in bringing down the villain known as Le Chiffre, James Bond could just have been another one of "Well, it was not too late.

Had it not been for his involvement in bringing down the villain known as Le Chiffre, James Bond could just have been another one of such civil servant spies.

Unfortunately, this is the only aspect of the Casino Royale story that I actually liked. The idea of James Bond and his mission is what draws me to the books, but not in fact the character of James Bond himself.

James Bond, as a character, is an utterly unlikable, chauvinist, self-centered idiot, who happens to be good at playing cards but is otherwise pretty lucky to have anything go his way - whether it is his involvement with women or his actually staying alive.

I first read Casino Royale some years ago, shortly before the film was released, and really liked it for the plot and the fact that a card game could pose more danger to the world's biggest villains than any attempts of arrest or assassination.

However, I enjoyed that the book dwelt on thinking through Bond's moves at the baccarat table more than on action scenes. However, on this particular re-read of the story, I felt more drawn to paying attention to the way Bond interacts with the world around him and was reminded why in some of the subsequent books I tend to root for the villains - I just can't stand James Bond.

Would I still recommend this book? I think it is important to demystify the legend and the franchise - even tho I do enjoy the films!

I finally got to read a Bond novel Yes, so far I had not read any of his books, but had religiously seen almost all the movies especially the ones released during the late seventies and the early eighties - my teens and twenties.

I enjoyed the movies for their goofy speed, silly plots, the imperturbability of Bond and all those lovely ladies MMMMM! But somehow, I never got around to the material where these films took off from.

And now I realise that I am too late. There is absolutely no s I finally got to read a Bond novel There is absolutely no suspense: The Soviet Union is long since defunct, so its demonisation is not even objectionable now, only laughable especially when one considers what the "good guys" are doing nowadays.

And Bond's attitude to women should have been objectionable even in those days - he is only interested in how to get them to bed.

In fact, he is interested in finishing the mission quickly so as to get down to the serious business of sexually exploiting the pretty girls in the story.

In this book, Bond comes as surprisingly naive. His only positive contribution is his luck at Baccarat Ian Fleming somehow attributes it to his gambling prowess, but I failed to see the connection.

He does not win a single fight, and lets himself be captured by acting like the hero of a third rate melodrama. In fact, the story moves on despite Bond, not because of him.

However, I liked the human face of the character. James Bond is not the cool and super-efficient murderous automaton of the movies here - he is very human and vulnerable too vulnerable where ladies are involved.

Also, the novel is not entirely black and white with regard to heroes and villains: I have decided to read all the original stories one by one, if only to see how the movies compare with the written word.

View all 3 comments. Sep 16, David Schaafsma rated it liked it Shelves: I got back into Bond from the comics adaptations that are being made by Dynamite, meant to be in keeping with the original tone of Ian Fleming's novels.

I had read some of them over the years, but like most people, when I think of Bond I think of Sean Connery: Suave, sophisticated, urbane, vodka martini shaken, not stirred , fast cars, the latest guns and gadgets, great clothes, and hot women.

My sister and I used to watch all the movies again and again and we assessed the hotness of the women I got back into Bond from the comics adaptations that are being made by Dynamite, meant to be in keeping with the original tone of Ian Fleming's novels.

My sister and I used to watch all the movies again and again and we assessed the hotness of the women and their worthiness for Bond.

The look had to be right, and increasingly, they had to have physical skills in addition to sexual ones of which you actually never saw evidence, really, in the PG movies.

In rereading through listening to Casino Royale today for five hours in the car, I was struck by how dated and sexist the book is with respect to women, but if you like Bond films, even today's versions, you don't expect deeply feminist stories.

Casino Royale is basically divided into three parts: The mainly surprising part is the way Bind falls for Vesper, to a consideration of marriage.

The surprising turn of events in the end may have something to do with Bond's cooly aloof relationship with women in the later works of the series, but my impression is that the first Fleming glimpse of Bond is both tougher the torture, the murders, the unsentimental hard edge to his talk and demeanor and then softer he speaks of love and marriage in a matter of days?!

Is this Romeo and Juliet? Aug 22, Richard Derus rated it liked it. Kind of a time capsule of what was wrong with What redeems it is the sheer balls-out what-did-I-just-watch comedic pace of the thing.

The return of Ursula Andress, this time as superspy Vesper Lynd not to be mistaken for 's Vesper, completely different character , is notable; but the turn to the comedic and ridiculous is signalled by Bond having a child by Mata Hari, yclept Mata Bond.

It was one of the many moments where I rolled my eyes so hard I think I saw my brain. Don't go into the film thinking it's a Bond flick and maybe it's okay Why watch it, then?

Because David Niven is very good at being urbanely nuts. If he arched his eyebrow any higher, he's lose it in his receding hairline. Because Ursula Andress is classic as Vesper.

Because Orson Welles is endearingly baffled as Le Chiffre, seeming not to have seen a script before being shoved in front of the camera.

It's like a Warhol-movie moment. If you're a straight guy, Jacqueline Bisset and Barbara Bouchet are pneumatically endowed. But Peter Sellers was a major disappointment to me.

Clouseau was his only character at that point, I guess. Not Bond, but fun. View all 13 comments. When one reads these pages one is struck by the description of the character and his actions; he's cold, aloof, calculating, isolated.

He's not a swaggering, macho, seducing machine. Don't get me wrong! Bond likes the ladies, but they have their uses.

They are props and they are there for an affair once the case is solved. He's probably the most attractive man in the room.

In Casino Royale Bond is after Le Chiffre, a money man for a communist organization who has embezzled. High stakes gambling ensues to recoup his losses.

Bond challenges him at baccarat. This is a game I've never seen played. Bond's eventual capture and torture is spot-on the movie.

There is also a Vesper, but her story follows a different trail. I'm looking forward to reading all 13 of this series.

Aug 14, Inder rated it did not like it Recommends it for: A-holes who need some tips. Also - incredibly, over-the-top offensive. Bond wants the somewhat-withholding Vesper because he knows that making love to her will always "have the sweet tang of rape"??

Misogynist zingers aside, it's at least 70 pages too long. When it wasn't repulsive and offensive, it was really boring. I'm not saying it didn't have its fun moments, but they were surprisingly few and far between.

Raymond Chandler is quoted on the back as saying, "Bond is what every man would like to be and So. Raymond Chandler is quoted on the back as saying, "Bond is what every man would like to be and what every woman would like to have between her sheets.

Disturbing, to say the least. I want my morning back. Update - This is still a very well written book that introduced us to the world most famous secret agent.

It is so well written by Ian Fleming his skill of descriptive writing have always been the best part of his writing.

While I am no fan of a game of baccarat the man writes so well you can actually participating in the fun and games. Fleming as a writer deserves much more credit than he has been given.

Always a pleasure re-reading a Fleming novel. They remain some of my favorite rereads. My dad being in the claws of Dementia did recently tell me that is was alright that I took some books form his bookshelves, he did refer to Casino Royale among them.

I still have that copy he bought as a young man. This is the book where the character of James Bond is being introduced to the world.

The plot is essentially an idea that the writer Fleming had during the war when he was involved with the intelligence service, where he was involved in an idea to play in a casino against the opposition and make them lose all their money.

Fleming did it not as well as his hero. In with the movies still more than a decade away Fleming introduces his hero: Then the soul-erosion produced by high gambling - a compost of greed and fear and nervous tension - becomes unbearable and the senses awake and revolt from it.

This helped him to avoid staleness and the sensual bluntness that breeds mistakes. The story is highly improbable but the very entertaining.

It is a story about gambling, which is very aptly described by Ian Fleming and does transport you to the smokey casino where Bond plays for high stakes.

Fleming has the skill to write very good about card games and golf, no-one could ever interest me for these activities but Fleming. The mood is very well written by Fleming as are the actions of the secret agent.

In my humble opinion this is one of the more exciting spy-novels written. And well worth a read before any of the modern day thrillers on that subject.

Sep 11, K. My name is Bond. My dad used to bring us, his kids, to movies when we were kids and I can still remember all the expensive cars exploding on the screen, shapely Bond girls in their bikinis, the high-powered guns and James Bond running, being chased by bad guys, escaping death in a millisecond precision.

I am heartened to know that Casino Royale , first published in , was the first James Bond book. So, it was the intro book to all Bond novels.

It also explained his character: So, I would think that this book has the more human James Bond. In fact, there are fewer actions here compared to what I saw in his movies.

Here he was tortured without any clothes on and I could not believe how he was able to escape death.

He also fell in love with his gorgeous partner whose secret was revealed in the end that made my jaw dropped. So I kept reading till the last sentence that again made my jaw dropped.

Yes, this book can make your jaw drop several times. Great until the last word. I saw the 3rd movie adaptation several years ago and I liked it.

Wiki says, however, that the original one was in and Bond was played by an actor called Barry Nelson. But the most recent version was starring Daniel Craig.

It's amazing to see what 42 years can do to the character. Nelson looked plump, hairy, slightly cross-eyed and looks feeling cold while Craig is fit, buff, hairless, green-eyed and loves the sea.

It could be the global warming! View all 14 comments. Daniel Craig is my Bond. I've never seen Brosnan's or Connery's or Dalton's Bond, or anyone else's.

Being as how I've seen the movie numerous times, I was initially leery of reading the original novel -- I hate reading the book AFTER I've seen the adaptation, because I never get the full enjoyment out of it that way.

Happily though, it seems the film people stuck very close to the source mate Daniel Craig is my Bond. Happily though, it seems the film people stuck very close to the source material in their adaptation, aside from the ending.

I do appreciate the way they updated the film, since the novel was written in the s. I imagine it may have been a bit scandalous back then, the amount of graphic sex and violence mentioned in these pages, but then again perhaps not?

I wish I could ask my grandfather if he'd ever read Fleming's novels and see what he thought of them back then. And thankfully the film portrayed Bond as more of a charmer and ladies' man than the asshole who completely views women as objects in the book.

He's extremely cold and methodical here, where in the movie he is much more warm-blooded. Will be looking up more of his voice work in the future!

If you can't tell, I recommend the audio xD And I didn't realize how short this was going to be! Time to go find something else to listen to!

View all 10 comments. May 28, Madeline rated it liked it Shelves: Call it a guilty pleasure, this book was just fun to read, mostly because I a love Bond movies anyway and b delight in sexist jokes, which made it easier for me to read Bond's anti-feminist rants and just giggle to myself.

Here's one of my favorites, when Vesper Lynd gets herself kidnapped by the bad guys and Bond has to take the trouble to chase after them: Why the hell couldn't they just Call it a guilty pleasure, this book was just fun to read, mostly because I a love Bond movies anyway and b delight in sexist jokes, which made it easier for me to read Bond's anti-feminist rants and just giggle to myself.

Why the hell couldn't they just stay at home and mind their pots and pans and leave men's work to the men. And now for this to happen to him, just when the job had come off so beautifully.

For Vesper to fall for an old trick like that and get herself snatched and probably held to ransom like some bloody heroine in a strip cartoon.

I love the smell of misogyny in the morning. In Bond's defense, Vesper doesn't do much too much to change his opinion of women and their overall uselessness.

She's supposed to be some kind of radio technician, but never gets to demonstrate any shred of intelligence that elevates her above the average 7th grade girl.

Her only good bit of dialogue comes towards the end of the book, when she and Bond are safe and on vacation together: You make me feel like an expensive gigolo.

I'm only doing what I was told. Will you marry me? The rest of the time she's busy running around after Bond, being referred to as "the girl" and saying things like, "Do you mind if we go straight into dinner?

I want to make a grand entrance and the truth is there's a horrible secret about black velvet. It marks when you sit down.

And, by the way, if you hear me scream tonight, I shall have sat on a cane chair. Bond, for his part, didn't say anything especially intelligent either and made me thank god for Daniel Craig and his writers.

I couldn't decide which was more annoying: Bond and Vesper during the assignment when they made banal small talk and Bond speculated on how soon he would sleep with her, or after they survive and decide they're in love and go on vacation together.

I think it's the latter - once Bond and Vesper survive the kidnapping, all potential of being cool vanishes as they become the most irritating couple ever.

Having to read about them schmooping their way across France, eating caviar, and calling each other "Darling," "My love," and "Dearest" was enough to make me vow never to read another Ian Fleming book again.

Anyway, point of review: Pick whichever you'd prefer. View all 5 comments. When I finally got around to reading this book I was in for more than a few surprises.